Get in touch 0117 325 0526

Case update (3): Vicarious liability 

What do we already know?

 We updated you in our December 2020 Newsletter Case update (2): Employer’s liability – the tribunal finds nothing to laugh about in an employee’s practical joke that the High Court in Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Ltd found that an employer was not liable for an employee’s practical joke that caused another person personal injury. This was because the incident was unconnected to any instruction given by the employer to the employee in relation to his work and could not be said to be within the field of activities assigned to the employee by his employer.

What’s new?

The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court’s decision that the employer was not vicariously liable for its employee’s practical joke. Of particular importance:

The Court of Appeal also helpfully found that there was no need for the employer to show that it had provided specific instructions or systems to avoid practical jokes or ‘horseplay’.

Implications:  This is good news for employers. However, it remains important that staff have well-defined roles and responsibilities and are made fully aware of what is appropriate behaviour at work. Also, that there are appropriate health and safety policies and procedures and the staff are provided training in this respect. Then if a practical joke does go wrong at least it will be likely be viewed as the result of the employee’s choice and (poor) sense of humour.

Share this...

Review Solicitiors