Get in touch 0117 325 0526
Tags: consultations, consultations on ERB, Employment Rights Bill
Categories: Employment Law
The ERA introduces a new statutory, day-one right to unpaid bereavement leave for those employees who suffer the loss of a ‘loved one’, including pregnancy loss before 24 weeks (which is not covered under current statutory entitlements). The consultation (available here) seeks views on:
Eligibility: Including which relationships should qualify – immediate family, extended family, or close friends. For pregnancy loss, it asks whether leave should be limited to the person who was pregnant or include others such as partners, intended parents, and those in surrogacy arrangements. It also considers which types of pregnancy loss should qualify, including miscarriage, ectopic or molar pregnancy, IVF embryo transfer loss, and medical terminations.
Length and flexibility of the leave: Employees will be entitled to a minimum of one week of unpaid leave, to be taken within a 56-day window. Feedback is sought on whether the entitlement should be longer or the time window extended, and whether leave should be taken in one block or flexibly in smaller units.
Notice and evidence: The consultation asks how much notice should be required and whether any evidence should be provided. It acknowledges that in cases of pregnancy loss, requiring proof may be distressing or impractical.
Policy steps: The consultation asks for views on steps the Government could take to help employers implement the new leave and support their employees (such as minimum standards and guidance).
The consultation closes on 15 January 2026, with implementation expected in 2027.
ERA plans to make it unlawful to dismiss a pregnant woman, a mother on maternity leave, or a mother who has returned to work (for at least six months), except in very specific circumstances. The consultation (available here) is seeking views on:
Circumstances for lawful dismissal: The consultation asks whether the existing reasons for dismissal should remain as they are for pregnant women and new mothers – but with a new stricter test of fairness. Or, if the Government should reduce, restrict or remove some of the existing five fair reasons for dismissal. For example, if it should only be permissible to dismiss for gross misconduct (rather than the broader misconduct); prohibit dismissal for poor performance; and/or only dismiss for redundancy in cases of imminent financial difficulty where no alternative exists (similar to the threshold for ‘fire and rehire’).
Timing: The consultation also seeks views on the start and end point of the protected period – for example, whether protection should begin when the employee notifies their employer or from the start of pregnancy and whether it should extend to six months after the employee’s return to work or to 18 months after the birth.
Scope: The consultation asks whether protections should extend to other parents (e.g. those taking adoption leave or shared parental leave) and how to support awareness of the rights.
Support: The consultation asks how it can support employers through the change and how to mitigate unintended consequences (such as employers being reluctant to recruit women of child-bearing age).
The consultation closes on 15 January 2026, with proposed implementation in October 2027.
To raise awareness of the right to join a trade union, ERA introduces a new duty on employers to give a written statement to workers informing them at the start of their employment and at other times during their employment of their right to join a union. The consultation (available here) is seeking views on:
Content: The consultation asks what the statement should say. For example, whether it should set out the statutory protections for union membership and whom to contact. The Government’s preference is to introduce a standard template statement for employers to issue.
Form: For example, if the statement should be provided as part of the written particulars of employment or separately – for example, via an employer’s intranet .
Delivery: For example, if it should be provided at the start of employment or when a contract changes and/or re-issue at intervals.
Frequency of delivery: The Government’s preferred approach is for reminders to be sent annually. However, the option of sending it every six months and sector-specific frequency requirements are also being considered.
The consultation closes on 18 December 2025 and the new right is due to come into force by October 2026.
ERB introduces a new statutory right for unions to access workplaces physically and digitally. Existing voluntary access arrangements would remain unchanged. The consultation (available here) seeks views on:
Process and scope of access: the consultation asks what types of access should be included. For example, physical, digital or online access and whether union representatives should be able to distribute information or hold meetings during working hours.
Disputes: The consultation asks how the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) should resolve disputes.
Enforcement: The consultation proposes a framework of penalties for employers or unions that breach access agreements. It asks what mechanisms should be used for enforcement, levels of sanction – including potential financial penalties – and whether there should be appeals or mediation routes.
The consultation closes on 18 December 2025 and the new right is due to come into force by October 2026.
The Government has published a draft Code of Practice and consultation document on Electronic and Workplace Balloting, available here and here.
Currently, certain statutory trade union ballots can be conducted only by post – including: ballots on internal union matters (such as political funds and resolutions); union mergers and union elections; and ballots on issues of relevance to employers, such as industrial action. Different rules apply to statutory recognition and derecognition ballots, which may be conducted either by post or through workplace balloting.
When ERB comes into force, the Government will be able to introduce both electronic and workplace voting (as well as postal voting) by using a statutory instrument.
The draft Code sets out how unions should run such voting systems:
However, digital balloting would only be allowed within a tightly controlled security and data-protection framework and non-compliance with particular steps could lead to a breach of legal requirements. Also, before any of the new voting methods can be used, the responsible person (either a union official or the Central Arbitration Committee) would be required to consider a range of factors, including the security and integrity of the proposed voting method.
The consultation is open for responses until 28 January 2026.
5.0/5